🔗 Share this article

Government closures have become a recurring element of US politics – however this one feels especially difficult to resolve due to shifting political forces along with deep-seated animosity among both major parties.

Certain federal operations face a temporary halt, with approximately 750,000 employees are expected to be put on furlough without pay as Republicans and Democrats can't agree regarding budget legislation.

Legislative attempts to resolve the impasse have repeatedly failed, with little visibility on a clear resolution path this time as both parties – as well as the nation's leader – can see some merit in digging in.

These are several key factors in which things feel different in 2025.

First, For Democrats, it's about Trump – beyond healthcare issues

The Democratic base has been demanding over recent periods for their representatives adopt stronger opposition against the current presidency. Well now Democratic leaders has a chance to demonstrate they have listened.

In March, the Senate's top Democrat was fiercely criticised after supporting GOP budget legislation thus preventing a shutdown early this year. This time he's digging in.

This is a chance for Democrats to demonstrate they can take back some control from a presidency that has moved aggressively on its agenda.

Opposing the GOP budget proposal comes with political risk as citizens generally may become impatient as the dispute drags on and consequences begin to mount.

The Democrats are leveraging the shutdown fight to highlight concerns about expiring health insurance subsidies and Republican-approved federal health program reductions for the poor, both facing public opposition.

They are also trying to curtail executive utilization of his executive powers to rescind or withhold money authorized legislatively, which he has done in international assistance and other programmes.

2. For Republicans, it's an opportunity

The President and one of his key officials have made little secret of the fact that they smell a chance to make more of the cutbacks to the federal workforce that have featured in the Republican's second presidency so far.

The nation's leader personally stated recently that the government closure provided him with a "unique chance", and that he would look to reduce funding for "opposition-supported departments".

The White House said it would be left with a "challenging responsibility" involving significant workforce reductions to maintain critical federal operations if the shutdown continued. An administration spokesperson described this as "fiscal sanity".

The scope of the potential lay-offs is still uncertain, though administration officials have been consulting with federal budget authorities, or OMB, which is headed by the administration's budget director.

The budget director has previously declared the suspension of federal funding for Democratic-run parts of the country, including New York City and Chicago.

Third, Trust Is Lacking on either side

Whereas past government closures have been characterised by extended negotiations among political opponents in an effort to get federal operations, currently there seems little of the same spirit for compromise presently.

Conversely, there is rancour. Political tensions persisted recently, as both sides exchanging accusations regarding the deadlock's origin.

House Speaker from the majority party, accused Democrats with insufficient commitment about negotiating, and holding out over a deal "for electoral protection".

Simultaneously, the Senate leader levelled the same accusation at the other side, saying that a Republican promise to discuss healthcare subsidies after operations resume cannot be trusted.

The President himself has escalated tensions through sharing a controversial AI-generated image of the Senate leader along with another senior in the House, where the legislator appears wearing a large Mexican-style sombrero and a moustache.

The affected legislator with party colleagues denounced this as discriminatory, a characterization rejected by the administration's second-in-command.

4. The US economy is fragile

Analysts expect about 40% of government employees – more than 800,000 people – to face furlough as a result of the government closure.

That will depress spending – and also have wider ramifications, including halted environmental approvals, patent approvals, interrupted vendor payments and other kinds of government activity tied to business cease functioning.

The closure additionally introduces fresh instability within economic systems currently experiencing disruption from multiple factors including trade measures, earlier cuts to government spending, enforcement actions and technological advancements.

Economic forecasters project that it could shave as much as 0.2 percentage points from national economic expansion for each week it lasts.

However, economic activity generally rebounds the majority of interrupted operations after a shutdown ends, similar to recovery patterns caused by a natural disaster.

That could be one reason why financial markets has appeared largely unfazed by the current stand-off.

Conversely, experts indicate that if the President carries out his threat of mass firings, the damage could be more long-lasting.